Skip to main content

Free abortion and contraception in France

Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Uruguay have all been in the news lately because of controversy over modest attempts to move away from restrictive (or total) bans on abortion.

The context in France, meanwhile, is completely different. Abortion is available 'on demand' in France through the first trimester of pregnancy then more restricted after that. The French government is expected to pass a law that provides free contraception for all and funds all abortions, even for minors. One gets the sense that this move is not terribly controversial. Furthermore, minors in France already have widespread access to contraceptives and are not required to seek parental consent to have an abortion.

The differences between French and American political cultures are interesting, too. In France:
  1. The link between free access to contraception and lower abortion rates is accepted.
  2. Not only is it appropriate that minors have access to contraception and abortion, it especially important that they have it, and for free.
  3. Control over family planning via contraception and abortion is viewed as a basic human right.
  4. The state, as part of the general social contract, has a positive obligation to provide the resources necessary to make one's human rights concrete and not just theoretical. 
If this news is going to have any impact in the U.S., my guess would be that pro-life groups will use the French experience as an example of what happens when one goes down the slippery slope of 'socialist' government support for family planning. 

Links:

Article in The Huffington Post (October 26, 2012); the article, in its tone and emphasis, betrays obvious sympathy for the general French perspective: France Free Abortion Bill: Lawmakers Vote to Fully Reimburse Procedure

Article in LifeSiteNews.com (October 26, 2012): French Natl Assembly votes for full funding of abortion, free contraception for girls 15 and up


Summary of French abortion law by Choice Ireland: Abortion information France
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S
3 comments
Read more

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou
Post a Comment
Read more

Four ways the presidential election could change reproductive politics

Setting aside all of the claims and counterclaims of the candidates and all related white noise, there are four concrete ways that the 2012 presidential election could cause policy changes on abortion, contraception, and family planning. If Barack Obama is reelected, little will change. If Mitt Romney is elected, I predict the following: The contraceptive mandate, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, would be withdrawn.  Barriers to defunding Planned Parenthood could be removed. As it is now, federal courts are stopping the complete defunding of the organization (i.e., withdrawing all federal funding) due to their interpretation of federal legislative language. With Romney as president, that language could be modified (assuming the changes could get past a Democratic Senate). The composition of the federal judiciary, particularly the United States Supreme Court, would be modified through appointments. If, say, Stephen Breyer or Ruth Bader Goldberg retired, Pres
Post a Comment
Read more