Skip to main content

Catholic views on abortion

Despite the Catholic Church's strong stance on abortion and contraception, American Catholics are not all that different from other Americans regarding these issues.  Polls tend to show that Catholics have a diversity of opinion on abortion and contraception that is not all that different from everyone else.

The clarity and absolutism of the official Church position prompts heated fights between a) those that see the Church teachings on the family and sexual behavior as organically linked to all other social justice issues and central to what it means to be Catholic, and b) those who appreciate many other aspects of Catholic doctrine (like its teachings on social justice) and wish there could be less of an emphasis on abortion and contraception.

Three recent news items illustrate this.

First, a poll just released by the Public Religion Research Institute reveals that a majority of Catholics would like to see the Church focus more of its attention on social justice and poverty issues, rather than right to life issues. This makes sense, given that Catholics are just not all that different from other Americans when it comes to assessing the morality of contraception and abortion, and in their behavior regarding contraceptive use.

Second, the Catholic Church and affiliated pro-life activists are pushing in the opposite direction. This is illustrated by a recent interview of Philadelphia archbishop Charles J. Chaput:
Abortion, Archbishop Chaput says, “is very serious issue that requires absolute adherence on the part of Catholics,” Chaput explains. “And if we don’t stand united on this issue, we’re bound to failure — not only in the area of protecting unborn human life but in maintaining our religious freedom,” he continues.
The third recent news items is an example of how sparks fly when these divergent views clash. LifeNews.com reports that the Sunday bulletin of the Holy Trinity Catholic Church (in Washington, D.C.) contained the first part of an article that argued that universal health care trumps other considerations-- in essence, suggesting support for Obamacare despite concerns over the contraceptive mandate. As you might imagine, this was not received well.

If you want to explore the differences between American Catholics and non-Catholics on contraception and abortion, the links below from the Guttmacher Institute, Gallup, and the Public Religion Research Institute provide a lot of great information.

Links:

Article in LifeNews.com about a Georgetown Church with a 'pro-Obamacare' article in the Sunday bulletin (October 22, 2012): Catholic Church Uses Bulletin to Promote Pro-Abortion Obamacare

Holy Trinity Catholic Church bulletin (October 21, 2012): Citizens of Faith-- Bringing Morality into the Voting Booth, Part One

Article from Reuters analyzing the 2012 American Values Survey (October 22, 2012): Catholics want more focus on poverty than abortion: survey

Public Religion Research Institute (October 22, 2012): The 2012 American Values Survey

National Review Online The Corner blog (October 23, 2012): The Issue of Abortion 'Requires Absolute Adherence on the Part of Catholics'

Guttmacher Institute Report (April 2011) comparing sexual behavior and contraceptive use among women of various faith backgrounds: Countering Conventional Wisdom: New Evidence on Religion and Contraceptive Use

Gallup poll (May 22, 2012): Americans, Including Catholics, Say Birth Control is Morally OK

Gallup poll (March 30, 2009): Catholics Similar to Mainstream on Abortion, Stem Cells

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou

Four ways the presidential election could change reproductive politics

Setting aside all of the claims and counterclaims of the candidates and all related white noise, there are four concrete ways that the 2012 presidential election could cause policy changes on abortion, contraception, and family planning. If Barack Obama is reelected, little will change. If Mitt Romney is elected, I predict the following: The contraceptive mandate, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, would be withdrawn.  Barriers to defunding Planned Parenthood could be removed. As it is now, federal courts are stopping the complete defunding of the organization (i.e., withdrawing all federal funding) due to their interpretation of federal legislative language. With Romney as president, that language could be modified (assuming the changes could get past a Democratic Senate). The composition of the federal judiciary, particularly the United States Supreme Court, would be modified through appointments. If, say, Stephen Breyer or Ruth Bader Goldberg retired, Pres