Skip to main content

Link between abortion and later very pre-term births

A new study will be rocketing around the pro-life and conservative media universe for the next few days, and likely making its way into pro-life literature for years to come.

The study, published in Human Reproduction, reports a correlation between induced abortion, in particular repeat induced abortions, and "very pre-term births," which are births that occur before 28 weeks of gestation.

The most pronounced effects appear where women have had three or more abortions. In the new study,  this represented .3% of all participants, or approximately 900 out of 300,000 women.

Pro-life activists have attempted to document various side effects of abortion-- depression and increased risk of breast cancer being two prominent examples-- but the science has not been there, despite insistence to the contrary. So any study published in a reputable journal will be seized on with extra enthusiasm.

Links:

The New York Times report: Abortions Linked to Risk of Preterm Birth

Abstract of the article in Human Reproduction: Birth outcomes after induced abortion: a nationwide register-based study of first births in Finland

Here is an example of pro-life reporting on the study, from LifeNews.com: Multiple Abortions Cause Preterm Birth Risk for Women


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou

How exceptions to abortion bans work in practice

The much awaited report of the Irish government "Expert Group"recommending how to implement exceptions to Ireland's abortion ban was issued this week. I have yet to read it, but when I do, I'll provide an analysis. In the meantime, one of the attorneys who participated in the famous "A, B and C" case has written an interesting essay about legal exceptions to abortion bans. In A, B and C v. Ireland (2010)  the European Court of Human Rights, consistent with the Supreme Court of Ireland, demanded that Ireland adopt at least a life-saving exception to its total legal ban on abortion-- which the Irish government has not done. In the wake of the death of Dr. Savita Halappanaver and resulting public pressure, the Irish government has finally produced a set of recommended legal and medical guidelines for doctors for implementing a "life" exception. The attorney and author of the Slate article, Julie F. Kay, expresses skepticism that a narrow life