Skip to main content

Irish abortion politics

Ireland is different from almost all European Union countries in banning all abortions, without any legislated exceptions, even for threats to a pregnant woman's life.

Both the Supreme Court of Ireland, in 1992, and the European Court of Human Rights, in 2010, have ruled that the Irish government must create, through legislation, a 'life' exception to the general abortion ban-- but they have not done it.

It is interesting to me how the legal dynamics are different than in the U.S. In the United States, a Supreme Court ruling that there is an exception to X law would essentially legally create that exception-- i.e., prosecutors would not be able to pursue legal charges, assuming a person's behavior fell under that exception. It appears that, in Ireland, the exception does not exist until it is legislated (if you know more about the Irish legal context and can shed some light on this, please leave a comment).

Irish women who want an abortion generally travel to the UK to obtain one-- if they can afford it, of course. Assuming that a life exception is eventually created, I wonder where those abortions would be performed within the country and who would perform them. One of the things the American experience with abortion teaches is that legalization does not equal easy access.

Links: 

Washington Post article on the contemporary debate: Abortion debate again divides Ireland

Wikipedia article: Attorney General v. X (1992)

Wikipedia article: Case of A, B, and C v. Ireland (2010)

Supreme Court of Ireland opinion: The Attorney General v. X (1992)

European Court of Human Rights opinion: Case of A, B, and C v. Ireland (2010)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S...

Spontaneous miscarriage and the morality of abortion

Hello, everyone! I have been away from the blog for a while, during a period of great activity regarding reproductive politics. So let's get back to discussing this always-interesting topic.  In reading an essay by Gary Gutting (subject of a separate post), I followed a link to this blog post by philosopher Peter Smith.  He wonders why intentional termination of an early pregnancy is more morally consequential than a spontaneous early miscarriage (which occurs in roughly 30% of conceptions). What he is really doing is calling attention to a perceived hypocrisy by pro-life advocates: If unborn are valuable humans from the moment of conception, why isn't there more of an outcry over the heavy loss of human life by natural miscarriage? If the value of the unborn is equal across all situations, Smith suggests, then this apparent lack of concern over natural miscarriage indicates that opposition to abortion, at least early in pregnancy, is about something else.  ...