Skip to main content

Irish abortion politics

Ireland is different from almost all European Union countries in banning all abortions, without any legislated exceptions, even for threats to a pregnant woman's life.

Both the Supreme Court of Ireland, in 1992, and the European Court of Human Rights, in 2010, have ruled that the Irish government must create, through legislation, a 'life' exception to the general abortion ban-- but they have not done it.

It is interesting to me how the legal dynamics are different than in the U.S. In the United States, a Supreme Court ruling that there is an exception to X law would essentially legally create that exception-- i.e., prosecutors would not be able to pursue legal charges, assuming a person's behavior fell under that exception. It appears that, in Ireland, the exception does not exist until it is legislated (if you know more about the Irish legal context and can shed some light on this, please leave a comment).

Irish women who want an abortion generally travel to the UK to obtain one-- if they can afford it, of course. Assuming that a life exception is eventually created, I wonder where those abortions would be performed within the country and who would perform them. One of the things the American experience with abortion teaches is that legalization does not equal easy access.

Links: 

Washington Post article on the contemporary debate: Abortion debate again divides Ireland

Wikipedia article: Attorney General v. X (1992)

Wikipedia article: Case of A, B, and C v. Ireland (2010)

Supreme Court of Ireland opinion: The Attorney General v. X (1992)

European Court of Human Rights opinion: Case of A, B, and C v. Ireland (2010)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou

Four ways the presidential election could change reproductive politics

Setting aside all of the claims and counterclaims of the candidates and all related white noise, there are four concrete ways that the 2012 presidential election could cause policy changes on abortion, contraception, and family planning. If Barack Obama is reelected, little will change. If Mitt Romney is elected, I predict the following: The contraceptive mandate, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, would be withdrawn.  Barriers to defunding Planned Parenthood could be removed. As it is now, federal courts are stopping the complete defunding of the organization (i.e., withdrawing all federal funding) due to their interpretation of federal legislative language. With Romney as president, that language could be modified (assuming the changes could get past a Democratic Senate). The composition of the federal judiciary, particularly the United States Supreme Court, would be modified through appointments. If, say, Stephen Breyer or Ruth Bader Goldberg retired, Pres