Skip to main content

Irish abortion politics

Ireland is different from almost all European Union countries in banning all abortions, without any legislated exceptions, even for threats to a pregnant woman's life.

Both the Supreme Court of Ireland, in 1992, and the European Court of Human Rights, in 2010, have ruled that the Irish government must create, through legislation, a 'life' exception to the general abortion ban-- but they have not done it.

It is interesting to me how the legal dynamics are different than in the U.S. In the United States, a Supreme Court ruling that there is an exception to X law would essentially legally create that exception-- i.e., prosecutors would not be able to pursue legal charges, assuming a person's behavior fell under that exception. It appears that, in Ireland, the exception does not exist until it is legislated (if you know more about the Irish legal context and can shed some light on this, please leave a comment).

Irish women who want an abortion generally travel to the UK to obtain one-- if they can afford it, of course. Assuming that a life exception is eventually created, I wonder where those abortions would be performed within the country and who would perform them. One of the things the American experience with abortion teaches is that legalization does not equal easy access.

Links: 

Washington Post article on the contemporary debate: Abortion debate again divides Ireland

Wikipedia article: Attorney General v. X (1992)

Wikipedia article: Case of A, B, and C v. Ireland (2010)

Supreme Court of Ireland opinion: The Attorney General v. X (1992)

European Court of Human Rights opinion: Case of A, B, and C v. Ireland (2010)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S...

Asking Pope Francis to reexamine abortion

Philosopher Gary Gutting, who always writes something interesting for The Stone column in The New York Times , recently asked if Pope Francis might reconsider the Catholic Church's traditional absolutist opposition to abortion. In doing so, Gutting makes a case for a kind of minimalist justification for abortion-- that is, abortion is immoral in most circumstances but there are a few cases where abortion is justified (in the case of rape, for example).  For that reason, the column makes for informative reading. Still, Gutting puts the cart before the horse: how and why would Pope Francis review the Church's view on abortion before reexamining its even-more-restrictive view of artificial contraception?  Anything can happen, of course, but Pope Francis has not really indicated a willingness to reconsider the doctrine of the Church on sex, conception, and abortion. Everything I have read from and about Francis is that he is advocating for a change of tone and emphas...