Skip to main content

A boat offering abortions

The prochoice group Women on Waves plans to dock a boat off of the coast of Morocco and offer abortions to women who want them.

Michelle Goldberg, at the link below, is good about teasing out the complications that might ensue, as well as the improbability of women running the publicity gauntlet to get on board and have an abortion. The main person behind the abortion-on-the-waves concept, Rebecca Gomperts, states that the event is not so much about directly meeting a demand for abortions in a legally restrictive country. Instead, the group is trying to raise awareness about unsafe abortions in countries where abortion is illegal. A fundamental premise of the international abortion rights movement is that women will have abortions regardless of legality. Abortions should be legal, therefore, so as to be offered and performed under safer circumstances.

The group also wants to raise awareness about 'medical' abortions-- those not performed using a surgical procedure like vacuum aspiration, but done through the use of an 'abortion pill' like misoprostol, which induces miscarriage. Their view appears to be that misoprostol is a preferable method of abortion, as one can self-abort (taking the pills at home) and have an easier time obtaining the pills than finding a doctor to do a safe surgical abortion.

I imagine Women on Waves has done its homework, but boat-off-the-coast activism makes me a little nervous. Women on Waves has lots of information on its web site about medical abortions, but do they know enough about the cultural, educational, and legal context of Morocco to confidently encourage women to undertake self-abortions? What if there are complications, for example? Will the miscarrying woman who encounters problems be comfortable going to a doctor/hospital that she trusts-- if there is such a person?

Careful and thoughtful campaigning to provide women access to family planning resources and safe abortion options early in pregnancy, including medical abortion, is one thing. Sailing in and conducting a publicity stunt is something else.

Article in The Daily Beast: Abortion at Sea

Website for Women on Waves

UPDATE: The Moroccan government is not happy: USA Today article

UPDATE II: From CNN: Morocco navy escorts abortion vessel out of port, group says

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou

Four ways the presidential election could change reproductive politics

Setting aside all of the claims and counterclaims of the candidates and all related white noise, there are four concrete ways that the 2012 presidential election could cause policy changes on abortion, contraception, and family planning. If Barack Obama is reelected, little will change. If Mitt Romney is elected, I predict the following: The contraceptive mandate, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, would be withdrawn.  Barriers to defunding Planned Parenthood could be removed. As it is now, federal courts are stopping the complete defunding of the organization (i.e., withdrawing all federal funding) due to their interpretation of federal legislative language. With Romney as president, that language could be modified (assuming the changes could get past a Democratic Senate). The composition of the federal judiciary, particularly the United States Supreme Court, would be modified through appointments. If, say, Stephen Breyer or Ruth Bader Goldberg retired, Pres