Skip to main content

Mary Ann Glendon and the 2012 election

From Abortion and Divorce in Western Law, by Mary Ann Glendon:
How are self-reliance, individual liberty, and tolerance related to selfish indifference, isolation, and nihilism? At what point does the language of individualism in a society or in a legal system begin crowding out other modes of discourse? When one has lost the ability to speak or even to form concepts in other ways, can one really be said to be living a richer and fuller life than one can express? Does a country or legal system which gives highest priority to individualistic values come to be inhabited only by persons who put those values above all others and act accordingly?
Glendon wrote this in 1987. I read this recently and immediately thought of the 2012 presidential election. David Brooks of The New York Times discussed something similar recently, asserting that one type of conservatism (organic/traditional conservatism) is being crowded out by another type (economic libertarianism).

Ironically, Glendon asked these questions in the context of critiquing American abortion law under Roe v. Wade, which has promoted, among prochoice activists and political elites, a conceptualization and defense of abortion rights that is very libertarian in nature. At the same time, Glendon noted the limited amount of government support (relative to Western European countries) for pregnant women and new mothers. What Glendon seemed to want was a combination of greater government limitations on abortion, reflecting a concern for unborn life, with greater concrete governmental support for women who carry their pregnancies to term. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The irony of the inquiry into Dr. Halappanavar's death

The Associated Press (via  The Washington Post ) reports that the composition of the panel that is investigating Dr. Savita Halappanavar's death in Ireland has changed: Prime Minister Enda Kenny told lawmakers he hoped the move — barely 24 hours after Ireland unveiled the seven-member panel — would allow the woman’s widower to support the probe into why Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old Indian dentist, died Oct. 28 while hospitalized in Galway.   Kenny’s U-turn came hours after her husband, Praveen Halappanavar, said he would refuse to talk to the investigators and would not consent to their viewing his wife’s medical records because three of the Galway hospital’s senior doctors had been appointed as investigators. Kenny said that the three doctors would be replaced by other officials “who have no connection at all with University Hospital Galway. In that sense the investigation will be completely and utterly independent.”   This makes sense. Why conduct an inquiry at all
Post a Comment
Read more

A post-Roe world

Among all of the policy areas where Barack Obama and Mitt Romney clash, their views on abortion present some of the starkest contrasts, despite what some see as an attempt by the Romney campaign to dial back its conservatism on abortion. (UPDATE: Just as I posted this, I came across this article on a new Romney ad . So much for "what some see." It's what it is.) The New York Times   published an editorial  predicting what would happen if the U.S. Supreme Court reversed  Roe v. Wade  (actually, Casey v. Planned Parenthood ). In short, around half of the states would enact much more restrictive abortion laws within a legislative session after the undoing of Roe/Casey . One thing that I wonder about in a post- Roe/Casey  landscape is how states would attempt to ban medical abortions, in particular self-abortions by women using drugs like Cytotec, which is an anti-ulcer medication but is also effective in causing a miscarriage early in pregnancy. (The active ingredient
Post a Comment
Read more