Skip to main content

A boat offering abortions

The prochoice group Women on Waves plans to dock a boat off of the coast of Morocco and offer abortions to women who want them.

Michelle Goldberg, at the link below, is good about teasing out the complications that might ensue, as well as the improbability of women running the publicity gauntlet to get on board and have an abortion. The main person behind the abortion-on-the-waves concept, Rebecca Gomperts, states that the event is not so much about directly meeting a demand for abortions in a legally restrictive country. Instead, the group is trying to raise awareness about unsafe abortions in countries where abortion is illegal. A fundamental premise of the international abortion rights movement is that women will have abortions regardless of legality. Abortions should be legal, therefore, so as to be offered and performed under safer circumstances.

The group also wants to raise awareness about 'medical' abortions-- those not performed using a surgical procedure like vacuum aspiration, but done through the use of an 'abortion pill' like misoprostol, which induces miscarriage. Their view appears to be that misoprostol is a preferable method of abortion, as one can self-abort (taking the pills at home) and have an easier time obtaining the pills than finding a doctor to do a safe surgical abortion.

I imagine Women on Waves has done its homework, but boat-off-the-coast activism makes me a little nervous. Women on Waves has lots of information on its web site about medical abortions, but do they know enough about the cultural, educational, and legal context of Morocco to confidently encourage women to undertake self-abortions? What if there are complications, for example? Will the miscarrying woman who encounters problems be comfortable going to a doctor/hospital that she trusts-- if there is such a person?

Careful and thoughtful campaigning to provide women access to family planning resources and safe abortion options early in pregnancy, including medical abortion, is one thing. Sailing in and conducting a publicity stunt is something else.

Article in The Daily Beast: Abortion at Sea

Website for Women on Waves

UPDATE: The Moroccan government is not happy: USA Today article

UPDATE II: From CNN: Morocco navy escorts abortion vessel out of port, group says

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The irony of the inquiry into Dr. Halappanavar's death

The Associated Press (via  The Washington Post ) reports that the composition of the panel that is investigating Dr. Savita Halappanavar's death in Ireland has changed: Prime Minister Enda Kenny told lawmakers he hoped the move — barely 24 hours after Ireland unveiled the seven-member panel — would allow the woman’s widower to support the probe into why Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old Indian dentist, died Oct. 28 while hospitalized in Galway.   Kenny’s U-turn came hours after her husband, Praveen Halappanavar, said he would refuse to talk to the investigators and would not consent to their viewing his wife’s medical records because three of the Galway hospital’s senior doctors had been appointed as investigators. Kenny said that the three doctors would be replaced by other officials “who have no connection at all with University Hospital Galway. In that sense the investigation will be completely and utterly independent.”   This makes sense. Why conduct an inquiry at all

Breast-feeding as an abortifacient?

I came across this citation while reading a William  Saletan column, which, if I can decipher the jargon, indicates that ovulation may still occur during the postpartum breast-feeding stage. Does this suggest that, during this stage, a woman may have a fertilized egg that does not implant due to breast-feeding? This would place breast-feeding as an abortifacient practice in line with other methods of contraceptive unacceptable to pro-lifers. Saletan's earlier column does a nice job of capturing the scientific uncertainty over what happens with eggs and implantation with emergency contraception (like Plan B).