Skip to main content

Link between abortion and later very pre-term births

A new study will be rocketing around the pro-life and conservative media universe for the next few days, and likely making its way into pro-life literature for years to come.

The study, published in Human Reproduction, reports a correlation between induced abortion, in particular repeat induced abortions, and "very pre-term births," which are births that occur before 28 weeks of gestation.

The most pronounced effects appear where women have had three or more abortions. In the new study,  this represented .3% of all participants, or approximately 900 out of 300,000 women.

Pro-life activists have attempted to document various side effects of abortion-- depression and increased risk of breast cancer being two prominent examples-- but the science has not been there, despite insistence to the contrary. So any study published in a reputable journal will be seized on with extra enthusiasm.

Links:

The New York Times report: Abortions Linked to Risk of Preterm Birth

Abstract of the article in Human Reproduction: Birth outcomes after induced abortion: a nationwide register-based study of first births in Finland

Here is an example of pro-life reporting on the study, from LifeNews.com: Multiple Abortions Cause Preterm Birth Risk for Women


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S...
3 comments
Read more

Spontaneous miscarriage and the morality of abortion

Hello, everyone! I have been away from the blog for a while, during a period of great activity regarding reproductive politics. So let's get back to discussing this always-interesting topic.  In reading an essay by Gary Gutting (subject of a separate post), I followed a link to this blog post by philosopher Peter Smith.  He wonders why intentional termination of an early pregnancy is more morally consequential than a spontaneous early miscarriage (which occurs in roughly 30% of conceptions). What he is really doing is calling attention to a perceived hypocrisy by pro-life advocates: If unborn are valuable humans from the moment of conception, why isn't there more of an outcry over the heavy loss of human life by natural miscarriage? If the value of the unborn is equal across all situations, Smith suggests, then this apparent lack of concern over natural miscarriage indicates that opposition to abortion, at least early in pregnancy, is about something else.  ...
Post a Comment
Read more