Skip to main content

The symbolism of coat hangers

The coat hanger made its appearance-- or reappearance-- in American culture this week in two odd ways.

First, the show American Horror Story-- which defies brief description-- recently featured a woman attempting to perform a self-abortion with a wire coat hanger. You'll have to read the Salon article about the episode, but, intentionally or not, the show's producers built a case for abortion-as-necessary so over the top that it almost undermines itself.

Second, the owner of a dry cleaning business in Ohio placed pro-life messages on the coat hangers that go back to customers with their clothes. The owner of the business seemed genuinely obtuse regarding the symbolism at work, although there is some evidence that people had been complaining about the hanger messages for a couple of years. A blogger who broke the story called this "the worst marketing decision ever." I posted a link to the article on a Facebook page I maintain for my students, and one of them said they checked The Onion web site to make sure this wasn't a hoax.

What is it about coat hangers? The coat hanger as the symbol of desperate, unsafe and illegal abortions has been part of the cultural imagination of Americans for 40 years.

The coat hanger symbol is just that, a symbol-- it does not entirely track with reality but resonates emotionally because it captures a deeper truth about the world. First, the wire hanger was not and is not the implement of choice for unsafe abortions performed by illegal abortionists or for self-abortions. There are a wide range of methods used in unsafe abortions (an article in the Western Journal of Emergency Medicine has a table of various methods). The wire hanger is the type of implement that is sometimes used, along with knitting needles and other long, sharp objects that are easily available. Second, the use of something like a wire hanger has a little less to do with the proverbial 'back alley abortion' than with self-abortion.

The deeper truth here is that women attempt and have abortions regardless of their legality. One of the fundamental tenets of the pro-choice movement is that making abortion illegal (or legal but difficult to access) does not fundamentally reduce the number of abortions but makes the abortions that do occur unsafe and sometimes fatal.

Below are some links to articles that explore unsafe abortions in the United States before-- and after-- the Roe decision.

Links:

Article in Salon (December 13, 2012): "American Horror Story's" coat hanger abortion

Article at The Huffington Post (December 11, 2012):  Pro-Life Coat Hangers at Springdale Cleaners: 'Worst Marketing Decision Ever'

Essay in The Atlantic by Rebecca J. Rosen that discusses the symbolism of the coat hanger (August 23, 2012): Consider the coat hanger

Essay in The New York Times by a retired doctor about treating women who attempted to self-abort with various implements (June 3, 2008): Repairing the Damage, Before Roe

Article in the Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (November 2009 issue): The Back Alley Revisited: Sepsis after Attempted Self-Induced Abortion

Article in Slate that discusses the phenomenon of post-Roe self-abortions in the United States; the article also links to a couple of scholarly studies about self-induced abortions (January 18, 2011): The DIY Abortion

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou

Four ways the presidential election could change reproductive politics

Setting aside all of the claims and counterclaims of the candidates and all related white noise, there are four concrete ways that the 2012 presidential election could cause policy changes on abortion, contraception, and family planning. If Barack Obama is reelected, little will change. If Mitt Romney is elected, I predict the following: The contraceptive mandate, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, would be withdrawn.  Barriers to defunding Planned Parenthood could be removed. As it is now, federal courts are stopping the complete defunding of the organization (i.e., withdrawing all federal funding) due to their interpretation of federal legislative language. With Romney as president, that language could be modified (assuming the changes could get past a Democratic Senate). The composition of the federal judiciary, particularly the United States Supreme Court, would be modified through appointments. If, say, Stephen Breyer or Ruth Bader Goldberg retired, Pres