Last week, I discussed how North Carolina's "Choose Life" license plate program was designed in a way that ran afoul of the First Amendment.
Pro-choice politicians in other states with pro-life license plate programs are going to use the court decision as a platform to challenge their own state programs. A legislator in Georgia is on the case already.
Defenders of the pro-life-but-not-pro-choice-plate programs will try to distinguish their policies from North Carolina's, but I am skeptical. The key would be to argue that their program, unlike North Carolina's, does not discriminate within a government-created public forum (license plates) where 'private' speech takes place, but instead is a direct expression of a government viewpoint.
If other courts issue rulings that uphold other state programs, the issue is likely to end up at the United States Supreme Court.
Links:
Article in the Atlanta Business Chronicle (December 12, 2012): Georgia lawmaker may seek "Pro-Choice" license plate following NC decision
Pro-choice politicians in other states with pro-life license plate programs are going to use the court decision as a platform to challenge their own state programs. A legislator in Georgia is on the case already.
Defenders of the pro-life-but-not-pro-choice-plate programs will try to distinguish their policies from North Carolina's, but I am skeptical. The key would be to argue that their program, unlike North Carolina's, does not discriminate within a government-created public forum (license plates) where 'private' speech takes place, but instead is a direct expression of a government viewpoint.
If other courts issue rulings that uphold other state programs, the issue is likely to end up at the United States Supreme Court.
Links:
Article in the Atlanta Business Chronicle (December 12, 2012): Georgia lawmaker may seek "Pro-Choice" license plate following NC decision
Comments