Skip to main content

Pro-life phone calls to voters

From The Huffington Post:
The anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List announced Friday that it plans to make automated phone calls to 4 million socially conservative voters in 12 swing states this weekend to ask them to vote for Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney.
At the end of an election, candidates move from trying to pick up new supporters-- most people have made up their minds-- to rallying current supporters to the polls. In campaigning, this is referred to as GOTV-- get out the vote. Elections can be won or lost on whether one's base turns out to vote, and that is particularly true in the 2012 presidential race.

That being said, the group will also send one million messages specifically to Hispanic Americans. These messages are going to be a bit broader-- more like 'faith and values' messages, rather than solely about abortion.

Polls predict that Hispanic voters will favor President Obama heavily in this election cycle. The standard take on Hispanic Americans is that they are more socially conservative as a group but have been turned off by the perceived intolerance of the Republican party. In this case, the robocalls might be an attempt to convince those voters to engage in single-issue voting: Whatever your reservations are about the Republican Party, it is wrong to vote for a pro-abortion/anti-values candidate.

I'm not sure that's going to work. The articles don't report whether the Hispanic recipients of the calls are a subgroup that have shown a prior willingness to vote Republican. That would make these calls a GOTV effort, too.

If not, then I don't understand the logic. If someone was inclined to be a single-issue voter on abortion or the conservative angle on 'values,' they would already be planning to vote Republican-- I can't see an automated call three days before the election changing that. We also don't know, from the articles, where the people being called live. If they don't live in battleground states, then these calls are a waste of money, regardless of intent.

Links:

Article in The Huffington Post (November 2, 2012): Anti-Abortion Group to Robocall 4 Million People this Weekend

Article in The Hill (November 2, 2012): Fred Thompson cuts robocall against Obama on abortion

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou

Four ways the presidential election could change reproductive politics

Setting aside all of the claims and counterclaims of the candidates and all related white noise, there are four concrete ways that the 2012 presidential election could cause policy changes on abortion, contraception, and family planning. If Barack Obama is reelected, little will change. If Mitt Romney is elected, I predict the following: The contraceptive mandate, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, would be withdrawn.  Barriers to defunding Planned Parenthood could be removed. As it is now, federal courts are stopping the complete defunding of the organization (i.e., withdrawing all federal funding) due to their interpretation of federal legislative language. With Romney as president, that language could be modified (assuming the changes could get past a Democratic Senate). The composition of the federal judiciary, particularly the United States Supreme Court, would be modified through appointments. If, say, Stephen Breyer or Ruth Bader Goldberg retired, Pres