In the last few election cycles, pro-life Republican lawmakers and candidates have regularly fed the public diet for controversy, with statements about abortion and rape, medically necessary abortions, and related topics.
There is no need, therefore, to gin up an outrageous statement where it does not exist.
The blog Little Green Footballs (LGF), along with The Raw Story and The Huffington Post, reports that a Missouri state senator, Brian Nieves, got into an argument over Facebook with a priest whom he thought was a reporter. Mr. Nieves has a history of mixing it up with constituents and critics and using rather tactless language and imagery when lashing out at those who criticize him.
In the ensuing exchange, according to LGF, The Huffington Post, and The Raw Story, Senator Nieves threw women under the bus by asserting that the life of a pregnant woman faced with a life-threatening abortion is just a "matter of convenience."
Outrageous! Yet what 'we' knew all along: Pro-lifers don't care about women!
But what did Mr. Nieves say, actually? Here is the text of the senator's statement (from LGF):
In Senator Nieves' opinion, his Facebook opponent asserting that the "partial-birth" abortion technique saves the lives of pregnant women proved that he did not know what he was talking about.
Senator Nieves, naturally, denied that he said that the life of a pregnant woman is a mere matter of convenience. Inexplicably, though, he did not go to the trouble to explain what he did mean. Instead, he chose to attack liberals as nasty and unpleasant creatures who are always the ones who start fights, etc.
The vast majority of Mr. Nieves' Facebook writings are typical chat room drivel and stereotyping about liberals, so I am not defending Mr. Nieves' quality of mind or eloquence of expression. Or his judgment, for that matter-- an elected politician gets into a public argument over Facebook? For crying out loud. He is not exactly elevating the dignity of the office of state senator.
He does not need his comments misread and misreported to look foolish, and if pro-choice writers on the left are going to criticize conservatives for bending the truth, they need to parse comments more judiciously.
UPDATE: Here are a few web sites that interpret Nieves' comment correctly (and critically): Think Progress and The Gloss
Links:
Post in Little Green Footballs (July 23, 2013): Anti-Abortion Politician Admits That the Life of the Mother Does Not Matter
Article in The Raw Story (July 22, 2013): Republican lawmaker: Abortion to save the life of the mother is 'a matter of convenience'
Article in The Huffington Post (July 23, 2013): Brian Nieves, GOP State Senator: Abortions to Save Mother's Life Are 'A Matter of Convenience'
Post at Women in the World (July 23, 2013): Anti-Abortion Pol: Mom Doesn't Matter
Missouri state senator Brian Nieves' Facebook 'rebuttal' of articles/posts about his stance on pregnant women
There is no need, therefore, to gin up an outrageous statement where it does not exist.
The blog Little Green Footballs (LGF), along with The Raw Story and The Huffington Post, reports that a Missouri state senator, Brian Nieves, got into an argument over Facebook with a priest whom he thought was a reporter. Mr. Nieves has a history of mixing it up with constituents and critics and using rather tactless language and imagery when lashing out at those who criticize him.
In the ensuing exchange, according to LGF, The Huffington Post, and The Raw Story, Senator Nieves threw women under the bus by asserting that the life of a pregnant woman faced with a life-threatening abortion is just a "matter of convenience."
Outrageous! Yet what 'we' knew all along: Pro-lifers don't care about women!
But what did Mr. Nieves say, actually? Here is the text of the senator's statement (from LGF):
What do you think? In my reading, senator Nieves did not mean that the life of a mother is a "matter of convenience." Instead, Nieves was expressing skepticism that the "partial-birth" technique of abortion was ever used as a necessary means to save the "life of the mother." Senator Nieves, like many pro-lifers, believes that "partial-birth" abortion was never medically necessary-- as such, it could be banned without hurting women. Therefore, when the partial-birth abortion technique was used by doctors, it was really used for abortions that were not medically necessary. In other words, "partial-birth" abortion is a "matter of convenience."“Really?!?! Are you sure you want to stick with that definition of partial birth abortion? Really? Didn’t you say you have an advanced degree? Your statement about ‘Life of the Mother’ is one of the most common yet kindergarten ways of proving that you don’t even know what a partial birth abortion is!! You are a ‘priest’ and you speak about matters of life and death for which you don’t have an ounce of knowledge?!? Shame on you.”“‘Life of the Mother?’ Your own argument proves it is a matter of convenience! Tell me this - Do you even know what a partial birth abortion really is? No, seriously, do you actually know what it is?? If so, explain to me what a partial birth abortion is.”
In Senator Nieves' opinion, his Facebook opponent asserting that the "partial-birth" abortion technique saves the lives of pregnant women proved that he did not know what he was talking about.
Senator Nieves, naturally, denied that he said that the life of a pregnant woman is a mere matter of convenience. Inexplicably, though, he did not go to the trouble to explain what he did mean. Instead, he chose to attack liberals as nasty and unpleasant creatures who are always the ones who start fights, etc.
The vast majority of Mr. Nieves' Facebook writings are typical chat room drivel and stereotyping about liberals, so I am not defending Mr. Nieves' quality of mind or eloquence of expression. Or his judgment, for that matter-- an elected politician gets into a public argument over Facebook? For crying out loud. He is not exactly elevating the dignity of the office of state senator.
He does not need his comments misread and misreported to look foolish, and if pro-choice writers on the left are going to criticize conservatives for bending the truth, they need to parse comments more judiciously.
UPDATE: Here are a few web sites that interpret Nieves' comment correctly (and critically): Think Progress and The Gloss
Links:
Post in Little Green Footballs (July 23, 2013): Anti-Abortion Politician Admits That the Life of the Mother Does Not Matter
Article in The Raw Story (July 22, 2013): Republican lawmaker: Abortion to save the life of the mother is 'a matter of convenience'
Article in The Huffington Post (July 23, 2013): Brian Nieves, GOP State Senator: Abortions to Save Mother's Life Are 'A Matter of Convenience'
Post at Women in the World (July 23, 2013): Anti-Abortion Pol: Mom Doesn't Matter
Missouri state senator Brian Nieves' Facebook 'rebuttal' of articles/posts about his stance on pregnant women
Comments