Skip to main content

Crisis Pregnancy Centers

I'm glad to be back from my long winter break. I hope you have enjoyed the holiday season and are ready to start discussing reproductive politics again.

I don't know if you came across this article in The New York Times on pregnancy centers (sometimes called "crisis pregnancy centers" or CPCs). It does a nice (and fairly sympathetic) job of describing the work of CPCs, which exist primarily to dissuade women from having abortions.

CPCs are run by pro-life activists. They advertise in billboards, in phone books, and on the Internet in a way that tries to reach women before they would contact or go to an abortion clinic (or an organization that offers abortion as one option or service of many, like Planned Parenthood). Just as an experiment, imagine you are a pregnant women thinking about having an abortion or considering other options (like adoption) and looking for information. Do a pretend search on the Internet. There is a very good chance that among the many results, right near the top, will be a link to a CPC (or "women's care center" or a similarly named organization). It will not necessarily be clear that you are being directed to a pro-life organization.

In towns with an abortion clinic, CPCs will often set up shop right next to the clinic, and use "sidewalk counselors" to try to persuade women entering the abortion clinic to go to the CPC instead.

People who work at CPCs use four basic tactics to dissuade women from having abortions:
  1. They provide an ultrasound examination to emphasize the humanity of the fetus.
  2. They provide information on alternatives to abortion, such as adoption. 
  3. They use standard pro-life talking points about the dangers of abortion, such as a post-abortion regret, links between abortion and breast cancer, medical complications from the abortion procedure, etc. 
  4. They offer to provide help to pregnant women through their pregnancy and possibly beyond (diapers and formula, for example). 
Pro-life activists fall into different camps, with different philosophies about how best to fight abortion. People who work at CPCs see themselves on the front lines, making concrete changes to women's lives and preventing abortions one at a time. 

In recent years, some state legislators have attempted to require pregnant women to receive their pre-abortion counseling from a CPC (rather than receive government-mandated counseling from a person at the abortion clinic itself). That kind of law has not passed yet, I believe, and it would almost certainly be unconstitutional. Some CPCs have also received government funding, in part because some offer abstinence-based birth control counseling. Most recently, CPCs have been in the news because pro-choice state legislators have attempted to require CPCs to more clearly disclose that a) they are pro-life organizations, and b) they do not provide abortion as one of their services. This legislation has run into opposition not just from pro-lifers but also free speech advocates. 

Links:

Article in The New York Times (January 4, 2013): Pregnancy Centers Gain Influence in Anti-Abortion Arena

For an excellent description of the various wings of the pro-life movement in the United States, read the following 2008 book by Professor Ziad Munson: The Making of Pro-Life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works

Unpublished report by Professors Ziad Munson and Christopher  P. Scheitle on CPCs and their place in the pro-life universe (June 16, 2009): Crisis Pregnancy Centers: The Remaking of the Abortion Debate

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The irony of the inquiry into Dr. Halappanavar's death

The Associated Press (via  The Washington Post ) reports that the composition of the panel that is investigating Dr. Savita Halappanavar's death in Ireland has changed: Prime Minister Enda Kenny told lawmakers he hoped the move — barely 24 hours after Ireland unveiled the seven-member panel — would allow the woman’s widower to support the probe into why Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old Indian dentist, died Oct. 28 while hospitalized in Galway.   Kenny’s U-turn came hours after her husband, Praveen Halappanavar, said he would refuse to talk to the investigators and would not consent to their viewing his wife’s medical records because three of the Galway hospital’s senior doctors had been appointed as investigators. Kenny said that the three doctors would be replaced by other officials “who have no connection at all with University Hospital Galway. In that sense the investigation will be completely and utterly independent.”   This makes sense. Why conduct an inquiry at all

Breast-feeding as an abortifacient?

I came across this citation while reading a William  Saletan column, which, if I can decipher the jargon, indicates that ovulation may still occur during the postpartum breast-feeding stage. Does this suggest that, during this stage, a woman may have a fertilized egg that does not implant due to breast-feeding? This would place breast-feeding as an abortifacient practice in line with other methods of contraceptive unacceptable to pro-lifers. Saletan's earlier column does a nice job of capturing the scientific uncertainty over what happens with eggs and implantation with emergency contraception (like Plan B).