Skip to main content

TRAPs, Mississippi, and pink abortion clinics

Speaking of Mississippi (see my last post), the fight goes on over the state's only abortion clinic, in Jackson.

As you know, the Mississippi government is trying to implement regulations that would make it impossible for the Jackson Women's Health Organization to stay open. The status of the clinic is in limbo while the state and the clinic battle it out in court.

In the meantime, two developments:

First, the governor, Phil Bryant, committed a gaffe, which in American politics means he told the truth. At a pro-life event, he stated the obvious: He wants to shut down the Jackson clinic. To be fair, it is not clear that he meant that his support and defense of the current Mississippi regulations is driven primarily by a desire to shut down the clinic. Governor Bryant theoretically could have a parallel desire to make the abortion process safer for women.

It does seem a bit of a stretch. What marks the Mississippi regulations as "TRAPs"(Targeted Regulations of Abortion Providers) is that a) they impose requirements on abortion clinics that are not imposed on providers of medical procedures of a similar nature and risk; and b) they are medically unnecessary-- they do not make significantly safer a procedure that is already relatively safe under the status quo ante.

Because of these factors, the Governor is just saying out loud what the regulations by their nature suggest-- they are a cover for making abortion in Mississippi effectively illegal.

The second development is that the Jackson Women's Health Organization repainted its building Pepto-Bismol pink, as an act of positivity and defiance. A reporter from the Clarion Ledger described the color as a "vibrant, cheery hue." That's charitable.

I don't know. I guess if painting your building pink helps you whistle through the graveyard, then I can't object too much. When I saw the photo, however, two thoughts came immediately to mind. One is that I'm not sure that making your abortion clinic look like a piece of bubble gum or like a Lego set sends the right message. The question of what kind of 'tone' or atmosphere one should shoot for in a medical setting requires a longer discussion, but something about the color of the building seems unserious.

The other thought is that pro-lifers are going to look at the building and see the color of blood. Any enterprising pro-life photographer can take a picture of the building and darken the tone just enough to make the clinic look like a horror house. If you read accounts of pro-lifers who pray or stand vigil outside of abortion clinics, they often talk about the 'sense of evil' coming off of the building. Regardless of whether the feeling is genuinely sensed or self-generated, do you think that painting your clinic a color redolent of scary clowns is a PR winner?

Links:

Article in ThinkProgress (January 11, 2013): Mississippi Governor: 'My Goal Of Course Is To Shut Down' The State's Last Abortion Clinic

From the Center for Reproductive Rights, a short summary of Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (March 5, 2009)

Article in ThinkProgress (January 31, 2013): Mississippi's Last Abortion Clinic Sends a Message: 'We're Here And We're Not Going Anywhere

Article in the ClarionLedger (January 30, 2013): Abortion clinic makes a statement with a pink paint job

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S

A Catholic EU health commissioner

The European Union Parliament approved a controversial choice for their top health official: The European Parliament backed a devout Catholic as EU health commissioner on Wednesday, brushing off critics who fear the Maltese politician could row back on EU policies on stem cell research, abortion and gay rights. Greens, Liberals and Socialists in the European Parliament had said they would vote against Tonio Borg, a former foreign and justice minister in Malta, saying his beliefs could influence EU policy. As commissioner, Borg's remit would include access to healthcare and contraception and the control of sexually transmitted diseases. Borg, who was in Malta on the day of the vote according to an EU Commission official, told EU lawmakers before the vote that his personal views wou

How exceptions to abortion bans work in practice

The much awaited report of the Irish government "Expert Group"recommending how to implement exceptions to Ireland's abortion ban was issued this week. I have yet to read it, but when I do, I'll provide an analysis. In the meantime, one of the attorneys who participated in the famous "A, B and C" case has written an interesting essay about legal exceptions to abortion bans. In A, B and C v. Ireland (2010)  the European Court of Human Rights, consistent with the Supreme Court of Ireland, demanded that Ireland adopt at least a life-saving exception to its total legal ban on abortion-- which the Irish government has not done. In the wake of the death of Dr. Savita Halappanaver and resulting public pressure, the Irish government has finally produced a set of recommended legal and medical guidelines for doctors for implementing a "life" exception. The attorney and author of the Slate article, Julie F. Kay, expresses skepticism that a narrow life