Skip to main content

Higher contraceptive use and abortions in Russia

I haven't had a chance to read and analyze this study, but I wanted to pass it on to you in the meantime. The study, which compares contraceptive use and abortion rates in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine, is making pro-life activists happy.

From what I can gather on a quick reading, the authors compared declining abortion rates in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine, and noted that Russia's abortion rate is not declining as quickly as it is in the other two countries and remains high. They also determined that Russian women are more likely to use "modern" methods of contraception than women in Belarus and Ukraine.

These observations, taken together, appear to validate the pro-life assertion that more contraceptive use = more sexual activity = more contraceptive failure and unintended pregnancies = more abortions. In other words, the promotion of contraceptives, rather than abstinence as a means of preventing pregnancy, leads to more abortions.

Note that, from what I read, the authors do not conclude this. Instead, they appear to call for more study  regarding the divergence in abortion trends among the three countries. Also note that the LifeSiteNews.com article discussing the study does not mention that Russian abortion rates are in fact declining, though not as fast as they are in Belarus and Ukraine. It focuses instead on the fact that Russia's abortion rate continues to be relatively high.

Please read the article yourself and let me know what you think!

Link:

Article published in PLOS One (November 30, 2012): Divergent Trends in Abortion and Birth Control Practices in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine

Article in LifeSiteNews.com (December 6, 2012): Study: Higher contraception rates associated with higher abortion rates in Russia

Here is the abstract to another study, published in Contraception, that pro-lifers like to cite regarding the contraception-abortion link (June 17, 2010): Trends in the use of contraceptive methods and voluntary interruption of pregnancy in the Spanish population during 1997-2007

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medically necessary abortions: The battle of the experts

Apparently, Representative Joe Walsh is not entirely alone! The assertion that an abortion is never medically necessary has been floating around in the pro-life universe for at least a little while. We are now witnessing a battle of the experts. One the one side is Joe Walsh and friends. Walsh himself released a pdf document with quotations from several doctors-- including some historically prominent pro-choice doctors, like Alan Guttmacher-- making the 'never medically necessary' claim seem quite reasonable. Also on Walsh's side are several doctors  who particpated in a recent "International Symposium on Maternal Health" in Dublin. Ireland, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling in 1992 , has a total ban on abortion. Irish pro-lifers want the country's politicians to resist pressure to implement even a life exception, so the question of medical necessity is directly relevant there. The "Dublin Declaration," released after the S...

Spontaneous miscarriage and the morality of abortion

Hello, everyone! I have been away from the blog for a while, during a period of great activity regarding reproductive politics. So let's get back to discussing this always-interesting topic.  In reading an essay by Gary Gutting (subject of a separate post), I followed a link to this blog post by philosopher Peter Smith.  He wonders why intentional termination of an early pregnancy is more morally consequential than a spontaneous early miscarriage (which occurs in roughly 30% of conceptions). What he is really doing is calling attention to a perceived hypocrisy by pro-life advocates: If unborn are valuable humans from the moment of conception, why isn't there more of an outcry over the heavy loss of human life by natural miscarriage? If the value of the unborn is equal across all situations, Smith suggests, then this apparent lack of concern over natural miscarriage indicates that opposition to abortion, at least early in pregnancy, is about something else.  ...