Skip to main content

Mississippi's only abortion clinic is TRAPed

The state of Mississippi has enacted a classic "TRAP" law and it might shut down the state's only abortion clinic.

A TRAP law is a targeted regulation of an abortion provider-- essentially, imposing regulatory requirements on an abortion clinic that the clinic cannot meet. Instead of directly outlawing abortion, one regulates abortion providers out of existence. The regulations are framed as common sense medical protections for the women that would receive abortions. This is a popular conceit and a favorite of pro-life activists, who charge that the uncaring abortion industry injures many women through shoddy medical practices.

Mississippi's version would achieve its intended effect by requiring all abortion doctors operating in the state to have hospital privileges, on the premise that this would be useful in case a problem occurred during the abortion procedure that would require a women to receive emergency or follow-up treatment at a hospital. 

The problem is that no hospital around the targeted clinic, in Jackson, will offer abortion doctors admitting privileges. 

This kind of regulation strikes me as clearly unconstitutional, for two reasons. One, these regulations are simply unnecessary. Doctors at abortion clinics do encounter complications on occasion and commit outright malpractice on occasion. What is not clear is that the nature of their work-- abortions-- leads to a greater proportion of patients encountering problems requiring hospitalization than doctors performing similarly dangerous/not-dangerous medical procedures in clinic settings. 

Two, everyone knows that the true motivation for Mississippi's law is to shut down the Jackson clinic. My reading of the Casey case (the 1992 Supreme Court decision that updated and modified Roe v. Wade) is that regulations that place a substantial obstacle in the path of women attempting to obtain an abortion, primarily to make acquiring an abortion more difficult, are unconstitutional. 

Advocates for the TRAP law at issue, like state representative Sam Mims, have not done a great job of sticking to the talking points:
"We're protecting the health of women by giving them professional care," he said.
Okay, that's not bad. But then this:
"I believe life begins at conception and I think a lot of Mississippians do as well. If this legislation causes less abortion, then that's a good thing," Mims added. (Source: CNN)
What do you think is the primary purpose of the law?

A federal district court judge imposed a temporary injunction against the law in July of this year. At the same time, however, the state was allowed to continue developing administrative regulations and procedures that would be used if the law is ultimately judged constitutional. While the lawsuit on constitutionality proceeds, it appears that Mississippi is ready with its regulations to shut down the clinic, as the clinic has failed to meet the administrative requirements. So the immediate question is if the federal district court will grant another temporary injunction, keeping the clinic open, until the status of the law is fully resolved.

Links:

Article at CNN (the page also includes links to other articles plus video reports) (November 28, 2012): Mississippi's only abortion clinic faces threat of shutdown 

Article at CNN that provides a more detailed description of the earlier injunction fight (July 13, 2012): Mississippi's sole abortion clinic can stay open for now

Federal District Court order providing a partial injunction against the Mississippi TRAP law: Jackson Women's Health Organization v. Currier, No. 3:12cv436-DPJ-FKB (SD Mississippi 2012)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The irony of the inquiry into Dr. Halappanavar's death

The Associated Press (via  The Washington Post ) reports that the composition of the panel that is investigating Dr. Savita Halappanavar's death in Ireland has changed: Prime Minister Enda Kenny told lawmakers he hoped the move — barely 24 hours after Ireland unveiled the seven-member panel — would allow the woman’s widower to support the probe into why Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old Indian dentist, died Oct. 28 while hospitalized in Galway.   Kenny’s U-turn came hours after her husband, Praveen Halappanavar, said he would refuse to talk to the investigators and would not consent to their viewing his wife’s medical records because three of the Galway hospital’s senior doctors had been appointed as investigators. Kenny said that the three doctors would be replaced by other officials “who have no connection at all with University Hospital Galway. In that sense the investigation will be completely and utterly independent.”   This makes sense. Why conduct an inquiry at all

Breast-feeding as an abortifacient?

I came across this citation while reading a William  Saletan column, which, if I can decipher the jargon, indicates that ovulation may still occur during the postpartum breast-feeding stage. Does this suggest that, during this stage, a woman may have a fertilized egg that does not implant due to breast-feeding? This would place breast-feeding as an abortifacient practice in line with other methods of contraceptive unacceptable to pro-lifers. Saletan's earlier column does a nice job of capturing the scientific uncertainty over what happens with eggs and implantation with emergency contraception (like Plan B).